(PS) Lull v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 13, 20202:19-cv-02444California9,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LULL, No. 2:19-cv-02444 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). All defendants except Ryan Zender, who has not appeared, move for dismissal. ECF No. 11; see also ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has opposed the motion. ECF No. 12. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that the motion to dismiss be granted, and that plaintiff be permitted to amend some but not all claims. I. BACKGROUND A. Allegations of the Complaint Plaintiff Christopher Lull owned a home on approximately six acres of land (“the Property”) in Placer County, some of which he leased to third parties for agriculture. ECF No. 1 at 3-4. He brings suit against Placer County and numerous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.