(HC) Sharonoff v. People of the State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH ALLEN SHARONOFF, No. 2:19-cv-2354-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court has reviewed the petition as required by Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings and finds that the petition is second or successive and must therefore be dismissed. A petition is second or successive if it makes “claims contesting the same custody imposed by the same judgment of a state court” that the petitioner previously challenged, and on which the federal court issued a decision on the merits. Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147 (2007); see also Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 485-86 (2000). Before filing a second or successive petition in a district court, a petitioner must obtain from the appellate court “an order authorizing 27 1 Petitioner…