Peacock

(PC) Zaiza v. Peacock

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20201:19-cv-01475California605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01475-AWI-JDP Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ECF No. 1 PEACOCK, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE AS UNTIMELY

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN 60 DAYS

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed October 17, 2019, ECF No. 1, is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff alleges that on February 17, 2016 his cell was searched in retaliation of plaintiff filing a complaint against prison employees at another facility. See ECF No. 1 at 5. Plaintiff, who has disability accommodations, was forced out of his cell without the use of waist chains or his cane, causing injury to his wrist and shoulder. See id. at 4-6. Further, after plaintiff submitted a grievance with the prison about the retaliatory search and lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.