Hubard

(PC) Penton v. Hubard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20202:11-cv-00518California1,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY PENTON, No. 2:11-cv-00518-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER L. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Anthony Penton (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 5, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 177.) On December 19, 2019, Defendants Besenaiz,1 Bradford, Donahoo, Gaddi, Lynch, Morrow, Pool, Quinn, Salas, Virga, Walker, and Johnson (collectively “Defendants”) filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 179–180), to which Plaintiff replied (ECF Nos. 185–

Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.