Spearman

(PC) Villegas v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20202:19-cv-01539California1,511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDOLFO VILLEGAS, JR., No. 2:19-cv-01539 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M. SPEARMAN, Warden, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is state prisoner incarcerated at High Desert State Prison, under the authority of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with a First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c). On December 10, 2019, the court dismissed plaintiff’s original complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 9. The court now screens plaintiff’s FAC pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends the dismissal of this action without further leave to amend. I. Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.