Perez

(PC) Gonzalez v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20201:19-cv-01447California219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, No. 1:19-cv-1447-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF

v. COUNSEL GUARD H. PEREZ, et al., (Docs. 4, 17, 19, 21, 22, 26) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed multiple motions for the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court does not find the required exceptional circumstances in this case. Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of counsel.

IT IS SO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.