(SS) Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20202:18-cv-02415California289 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA DIANE DAVIS, No. 2:18-cv-2415-WBS–KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 17, 24, 25) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 On March 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18 25), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 19 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were 20 filed. 21 Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 22 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.