(PC)Harris

(PC)Harris v. Wickert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20201:19-cv-00979California1,041 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CALVIN HARRIS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00979-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

C . WICKERT, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendant. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) ) (ECF No. 9) ) )

Plaintiff Calvin Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 4, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff had stated a cognizable claim against Defendant Wickert for violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims. (ECF No. 8.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint, or notify the Court in writing of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable claim, within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.