Thompson

(PC) Williams v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20201:19-cv-00330California906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, No. 1:19-cv-00330 NONE JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS

THOMPSON, et al., (Doc. Nos. 16, 19)

Defendants.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 9, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that some of the claims could proceed, while others were not cognizable as plead. (Doc. No. 13.) In that screening order the magistrate judge provided plaintiff the option to stand on his original complaint, proceed with it as screened, or file an amended complaint. (Id.) Plaintiff filed a notice of his willingness to proceed on the complaint as screened and to dismiss the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.