Pfeiffer

(PC) Freeman v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20201:20-cv-00320California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVON LEON FREEMAN, No. 1:20-cv-00320-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden; et al., PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 5)

17 Plaintiff Travon Leon Freeman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 4, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because he had accumulated at least three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and did not satisfy the section’s imminent danger exception. (Doc. No. 5.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.