Trujillo

Trujillo v. Galvan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20201:20-cv-00104California182 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1.40 UV VULUST EAL Le NY PVVUPIPIOCiil 2a Veni □□□ Payee +ViIs+

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00104-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

13] v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 SULEIMA FERNANDEZ GALVAN, doing (ECF No. 11) 15 business as Mariscos Pepes, et al., Defendants. 17 On April 14, 2020, Plaintiff, Jose Trujillo, filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of entire 19 action without prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) Defendants have not filed either an answer or a motion 20 for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed 21 without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 22 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

T IS SO ORDERED.

23 24] Dated: _ April 15, 2020 [spe ey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.