Hemphill

Hemphill v. Farr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20201:19-cv-01119California4,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 MONTREAL D. HEMPHILL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01119-AWI-EPG 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO:

(1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT;

15 v. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE

WISHES TO PROCEED ONLY ON THE

CLAIMS FOR UNLAWFUL ARREST AND

EXCESSIVE FORCE IN VIOLATION OF

THE FOURTH AMENDMENT; OR

JONATHAN FARR AND CHAD

MEDEIROS (3) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE Defendants. WISHES TO STAND ON THE

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO THE COURT

ISSUING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE

DISTRICT JUDGE CONSISTENT WITH

THIS ORDER

23 (ECF No. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

26 Plaintiff, Montreal D. Hemphill (“Plaintiff”), is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 27 in this action brought pursuant to California penal law. The complaint, filed April 15, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.