(SS) Black v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20202:18-cv-03022California1,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASHLEY MARIE PAIGE BLACK, No. 2:18-cv-3022 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff brought this action seeking judicial review of a final administrative decision denying plaintiff’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On December 4, 2019, the court entered the parties’ stipulation remanding this action for further proceedings and entering ////

24 1 Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 17, 2019. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on July 30, 2019). Accordingly, Andrew Saul is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.