Krauss
Krauss v. Walmart, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HOPE KRAUSS, aka DEONTE No. 2:19-cv-00838-JAM-DB KRAUSS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED v. COMPLAINT 14 WAL-MART, INC., a Delaware corporation; WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Hope Krauss (“Plaintiff”) filed this putative class action against her former employer, Defendants Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Associate, Inc. (collectively “Walmart” or “Defendants”), for violating California’s labor laws. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ECF No. 10, alleging Plaintiff failed to properly state her claims. Mot. to Dismiss FAC (“FAC MTD”), ECF No. 14. The Court granted the motion without prejudice and granted Plaintiff…