Stamper
(PC) Camposeco v. Stamper
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL CAMPOSECO, Case No. 1:19-cv-01330-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
TO SUPPLEMENT THE FIRST AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
BOUDREAUX, et al., (ECF Nos. 13, 14) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Samuel Camposeco (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint has not yet been screened. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the first amended complaint, (ECF No. 13), and Plaintiff’s letter regarding the first amended complaint, (ECF No. 14). The Court construes the filings as motions to supplement or amend the first amended complaint. In Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the first amended complaint, filed October 31, 2019, Plaintiff states that he mistakenly did not include a claim that he wishes to be included with his first…