(HC)Griffin

(HC)Griffin v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20202:20-cv-00256California812 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEXTER LAWRENCE GRIFFIN, No. 2:20-cv-256 EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BRANDON PRICE, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed an amended petition (ECF No. 22) which, for the reasons stated below, does not state a viable federal habeas claim. I. Legal Standards The court must dismiss a habeas petition or portion thereof if the prisoner raises claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious” or fail to state a basis on which habeas relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). The court must dismiss a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief[.]” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. II. Analysis The court has reviewed the petition and cannot discern the nature of petitioner’s claims.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.