Allenby

(PC) Ring v. Allenby

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20201:18-cv-01283California1,554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW ARLINGTON RING, 1:20-cv-00069-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MOVE

THE COMPLAINT FROM THIS CASE

vs. INTO CASE 1:18-cv-01283-NONE-JLT AS

THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

KARIM RASHEED, et al.,

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY

Defendants. CLOSING THIS CASE 16 I. BACKGROUND Andrew Arlington Ring (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint commencing this action was filed on June 13, 2016. (ECF No. 1.) The court finds that the Complaint used to open this case was intended by Plaintiff as the Second Amended Complaint in case 1:18-cv-01283-NONE-JLT. Therefore, the court shall direct the Clerk to move the Complaint from this case into case 1:18-cv-01283-NONE-JLT as the Second Amended Complaint and administratively close this case. II. PLAINTIFF’S TWO CASES A. Case 1:18-cv-01283-NONE-JLT; Ring v. Allenby, et al.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.