(PC) Watkins v. Tuolumne County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20201:18-cv-01385California591 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND C. WATKINS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01385-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS ACTION

TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. Clerk of the Court to assign a District Judge 16 On November 15, 2019, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim and granting him leave to amend his complaint. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s order.1 Therefore, on February 27, 2020, the Court issued an order to show cause, within 21 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 11.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.