Wilson
(PC) Kelly v. Wilson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWIN KELLY, No. 2:17-cv-2557 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. WILSON, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a former state prisoner previously incarcerated under the authority of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). Plaintiff proceeds pro se with an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that challenges the conditions of his prior confinement at the California Medical Facility (CMF).1 Because plaintiff is no longer in custody, he must complete and submit a non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith. See e.g. Adler v. Gonzalez, 2015 WL 4041772, at *1, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85909 (E.D. Cal. July 1, 2015), 26 Plaintiff mischaracterizes this institution as “California Men’s Facility,” which does not exist. Review of plaintiff’s attachments demonstrates…