Doyle
Doyle v. Marshal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS DOYLE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01435-NONE-SKO
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO
v. PROSECUTE AND OBEY THE
COURT’S ORDERS
NOAH MARSHAL, et al., (Docs. 4, 7) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE: 14 DAYS
_____________________________________/
18 On October 11, 2019, Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against 19 Defendants, but failed to either pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Doc. 1.) The Court entered an order on October 18, 2019, directing Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days of the date of service of 23 the order. (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on October 29, 2019. 24 (Doc. 3.) 25 Upon preliminary review of Plaintiff’s complaint, Plaintiff’s allegations appeared to mostly 26 relate to his criminal conviction in state court and may be more appropriately brought in a petition 27 28 …