(PS) Miner v. Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20202:19-cv-01624California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADIHA MINER, No. 2:19-cv-01624-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se filed her Complaint on August 14, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did not file objections. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.