Reid

(PS) Miner v. Reid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20202:19-cv-01575California266 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADIHA MINER, a.k.a. POCAHONTAS, No. 2:19-cv-01575-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER PERRI ARLETTE REID, Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner, a.k.a. Pocahontas (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se filed her Complaint 18 on August 14, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On March 24, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did not file 23 objections. 24 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 25 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983); see also 27 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.