Hernandez
(PC) Brookins v. Hernandez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BARRY LEE BROOKINS, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01675-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S
MARCH 26, 2020 ORDER DENYING HIS
) M. HERNANDEZ, et al., SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 69] ) )
Plaintiff Barry Lee Brookins is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s objections to the Court’s March 26, 2020 order denying his second motion to compel, filed April 10, 2020. (ECF No. 69.) Plaintiff’s objections shall be construed as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Reconsideration motions are committed to the discretion of the trial court. Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456, 460 (9th Cir. 1983) (en banc); Combs v. Nick Garin Trucking, 825 F.2d 437, 441 (D.C. Cir.…