Longia

(PC) Rodriguez v. Longia

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20201:19-cv-01714California2,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PEDRO RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01714-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ALL

v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

H. LONGIA, et al., (ECF No. 1)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Pedro Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on December 9, 2019. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint is based on his belief that he should be provided with lasik surgery, or at least given a consultation with a specialist. Plaintiff has attached the correspondence with the Health Care Services explaining why he has not been given this surgery, including that the optometrist has told him that lasik surgery would not improve…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.