Barnes

Barnes v. Hanford Superior Court Judge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20201:20-cv-00390California4,443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00390-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE

TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

HANFORD SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE, et (ECF No. 16) al., THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

17 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed April 15, 2020. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] monetary relief against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.