Medina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LOPEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-00794-DAD-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

I. MEDINA, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 On March 18, 2020, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim and granting her leave to file a second amended complaint.1 (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. On April 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court’s screening order, in which she states, “I repeat: I will not seek help from courts again. Any further correspondence from you will be refused.” (Doc. 16.) The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts…