Osemwingie

(PC) Barker v. Osemwingie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20202:16-cv-03008California1,232 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM BARKER, No. 2:16-cv-3008 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER OSEMWINGIE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendants’ bill of costs (ECF No. 76), which plaintiff opposes (ECF No. 77). I. Procedural History On December 23, 2016, the court received plaintiff’s pro se, original complaint. (ECF No. 1.) The complaint cited both 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (id. at 3-5), and on screening was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim (ECF No. 4). Counsel for plaintiff appeared shortly thereafter (ECF No. 5) and filed a first amended complaint (ECF No. 7.). The first amended complaint asserted claims under Title II of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12132; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (RA) of 1973; California’s Disabled Persons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.