Truillo

(PC) Casey v. Truillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20201:20-cv-00560California1,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00560-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE v. WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

J. TRUILLO, et al., FAILURE TO EXHAUST Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 James Arthur Casey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 14, 2020. (ECF No. 1). It appears from the face of the complaint that Plaintiff did not exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing this action. Plaintiff appears to admit the administrative process was available, and that he did not submit his appeal to the highest level. (Id. at 5 & 6). Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a response within thirty days, explaining why this action should not be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.