Truillo
(PC) Casey v. Truillo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00560-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE v. WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
J. TRUILLO, et al., FAILURE TO EXHAUST Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 James Arthur Casey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 14, 2020. (ECF No. 1). It appears from the face of the complaint that Plaintiff did not exhaust his available administrative remedies before filing this action. Plaintiff appears to admit the administrative process was available, and that he did not submit his appeal to the highest level. (Id. at 5 & 6). Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a response within thirty days, explaining why this action should not be…