(HC) Williams v. Tuolumne County Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20201:20-cv-00082California603 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 FREDERICK WILLIAMS, No. 1:20-cv-00082-NONE-SAB-HC 11 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING

12 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TUOLUMNE COUNTY COURT, TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE AND CLOSE

CASE, AND DECLINING TO ISSUE

14 Respondent. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 15 (Doc. No. 9) 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 30, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the pending petition, reasoning that petitioner’s claim that his current state sentence violates California’s sentencing laws fails to state a cognizable federal habeas claim. (Doc. No. 9.) The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the findings and recommendations. To…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.