Hensley

Hensley v. Lazer Spot, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20202:20-cv-00062California1,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RUSSELL K. HENSLEY, No. 2:20-cv-00062-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND

LAZER SPOT, INC. and DOES 1- 100, inclusive, 14 Defendant. 15 After Lazer Spot, Inc.’s former employee, Russell Hensley, filed suit in Yolo County Superior Court, the corporation removed this case to federal court. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Lazer Spot invoked the Court’s diversity jurisdiction, arguing the amount in controversy exceeded the statutory threshold and that the two parties—a California citizen and a Georgia corporation— are completely diverse. Notice of Removal at 2-6. In response, Hensley filed a motion to remand. ECF No. 8. He contends the Court should not rely upon the amount in controversy listed in his complaint because it mistakenly alleges that Hensley seeks up

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for April 7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.