Arreola

Arreola v. County of Fresno Public Defender's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20201:20-cv-00272California1,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 HARONERE WILTRON ARREOLA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00272-AWI-SAB 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF,

COUNTY OF FRESNO PUBLIC FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND

DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 1, 4)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 Haronere Wiltron Arreola (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on February 24, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On March 11, 2020, Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and it was found that he had failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 4.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.