Rodriguez

(PC) Crane v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20202:15-cv-00208California1,346 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, No. 2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. By order filed March 20, 2020, defendants Davey, Rodriguez, Probst, Barton and Robinette (hereafter “group defendants”) were ordered to submit certain documents for in-camera review. (ECF No. 206.) Counsel submitted the documents on April 13, 2020. Following in camera review, plaintiff’s request for further production is partially granted, as set forth below. Further scheduling of this action is stayed pending plaintiff’s review of pertinent discovery documents. I. Plaintiff’s Allegations This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against defendants Davey, Rodriguez, Robinette, Barton, Probst and Weeks. (ECF No. 16.) The court found plaintiff stated 26 Defendant Weeks is represented by separate counsel. Defendants Peck and Hurd were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.