Rosario

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VUSAL MANAFOV, No. 2:19-cv-337-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. ARNOLD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Previously, the court screened plaintiff’s initial complaint, found it deficient, and dismissed it with leave to amend within thirty days. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 14) which is screened below. Screening I. Legal Standards Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. Although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), a complaint, or portion thereof,…