CDCR

(PC) Harbor v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20202:19-cv-00384California1,578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TRAVYON C. HARBOR, No. 2:19-cv-0384-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR, et al. Defendants. 15 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His initial complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. ECF No. 6. Specifically, the court found that plaintiff had improperly attempted to pursue a class action (id. at 2) and had improperly joined three insufficiently related claims against multiple defendants (id. at 2-3). He has since filed an amended complaint (ECF No. 11) which is screened below. Screening I. Legal Standards Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. Although pro se pleadings are liberally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.