Pfeiffer
(HC) Taylor v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY TAYLOR, No. 2:19-cv-2227 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 30, 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action on the grounds that it includes unexhausted claims. Petitioner did not file an opposition to the motion. On March 10, 2020, petitioner was ordered to show cause why his failure to oppose the motion should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and petitioner was granted leave to file a motion to stay pending exhaustion. Petitioner did not respond, and has not filed an opposition to the motion or a motion for stay. The undersigned grants respondent’s motion, and grants petitioner leave to file an amended petition raising only exhausted claims. Motion to Dismiss Rule 4 of the…