Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND
vs. DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANT DR. KEVIN CUONG
BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al., NGUYEN (ECF No. 43.) Defendants.
16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.)
27 1 In his original Complaint, Plaintiff referred to this defendant as Dr. Bairamian, Dikran, M.D. (ECF No. 1.) The…