Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20201:16-cv-01066California701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING DISCOVERY

DOCUMENT IMPROPERLY FILED WITH

vs. THE COURT (ECF No. 39.) BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al.,

Defendants.

19 Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts, for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) This case is now in the discovery phase.

27 1 In his original Complaint, Plaintiff referred to this defendant as Dr. Bairamian, Dikran, M.D. (ECF No. 1.) The court entered the defendant’s name as Bairamian Dikran. (Court docket.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.