CDCR

(PC) Jacobs v. CDCR

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20201:17-cv-01599California2,339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE E. JACOBS, No. 1:17-cv-01599-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

CDCR, et al., THIS ACTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 25) 16 Plaintiff George E. Jacobs is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 21, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), finding that plaintiff had failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and providing plaintiff with an opportunity to amend his complaint. (Doc. No. 14.) In the screening order, the magistrate judge informed plaintiff that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20, he may not bring unrelated claims against multiple defendants in a single lawsuit. 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.