Estate of Alejandro Sanchez v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20201:18-cv-00977California3,549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ESTATE OF ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ, et Case No. 1:18-cv-00977-DAD-BAM al., ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiffs, MOTIONS TO COMPEL, VACATE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, vs. AND FOR EXPENSES 12 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. No. 65) 13 Defendants.

Currently before the Court are Plaintiff Estate of Alejandro Sanchez’ (“Plaintiff”) motion to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”) to produce amended responses and documents responsive to Requests for Production Nos. 1, 9, 13-16, and 25-27 and to amend its initial disclosures, motion to vacate the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order, and motion for expenses. (Doc. No. 65.) On April 8, 2020, the parties filed a Joint Statement Re: Discovery Disagreement pursuant to Local Rule 251. (Doc. No. 66.) The matter was heard on April 17, 2020, before United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. Counsel Mark Merin and Paul Masuhara appeared by telephone…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.