Murray

Murray v. Scelzi Enterprises, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20201:18-cv-01492California548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK MURRAY, an individual, on No. 1:18-cv-01492-NONE-SKO behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A Plaintiff, DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND CLOSE THE CASE v. (Doc. 32) SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation, Defendant. 18 19 On April 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a “Joint Stipulation to Allow Plaintiff to Dismiss Class Allegations Without Prejudice and for Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Remaining Individual Claims Without Prejudice to Allow for Re-Filing in State Court.” (Doc. 32.) The stipulation provides that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff dismisses his class claims without prejudice, and also dismisses his individual and PAGA representative claims without prejudice to allow for re-filing in state court. (Id. at 4.)

1 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.