Murray
Murray v. Scelzi Enterprises, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK MURRAY, an individual, on No. 1:18-cv-01492-NONE-SKO behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A Plaintiff, DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND CLOSE THE CASE v. (Doc. 32) SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation, Defendant. 18 19 On April 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a “Joint Stipulation to Allow Plaintiff to Dismiss Class Allegations Without Prejudice and for Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Remaining Individual Claims Without Prejudice to Allow for Re-Filing in State Court.” (Doc. 32.) The stipulation provides that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff dismisses his class claims without prejudice, and also dismisses his individual and PAGA representative claims without prejudice to allow for re-filing in state court. (Id. at 4.)
1 The…