Sherman

(PC) Evans v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20201:19-cv-00226California959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD A. EVANS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00226-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (ECF No. 51) SHERMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Richard Evans (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 10, 2020, following Plaintiff’s repeated filings of “Judicial and Administrative Notices,” the Court issued an order disregarding these notices as containing allegations occurring well after the filing of this lawsuit in February 2019, and not containing the types of adjudicated facts that are judicially noticeable. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff had been informed prior to that order regarding the legal standards for judicially noticeable facts. (ECF No. 32, p. 2.) In light of Plaintiff’s repeated and frequent filings of the same nature, the Court advised Plaintiff that documents submitted to the Court after April 10,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.