CHCF

(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20202:20-cv-00593California1,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:20-cv-593 EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CHCF, et. al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing two complaints (ECF Nos. 1, 5), he has also filed two applications to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2, 6). The court grants the first application and deny the latter as moot. Further, for the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s first amended complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed the plaintiff’s application (ECF No. 2) and trust fund account (ECF No. 4) and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ///// ///// ///// Screening I. Legal Standards Pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.