Perez
(PC) O'Connor v. Perez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN O’CONNOR, No. 2:18-cv-1057 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Presently before the court are plaintiff’s motions for sanctions (ECF No. 72, 78), motion to enlarge the record (ECF No. 71), and motion to compel (ECF No. 60). For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motions for sanctions, deny the motion to enlarge the record, and grant in part and deny in part the motion to compel. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff alleges that he suffers from sleep apnea and has a prescribed breathing machine. (ECF No. 22 at 3.) The mask broke and he filed the required Health Care Services Request form, but did not 27 …