Perez

(PC) Garcia v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20201:17-cv-00865California1,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GARCIA, Case No. 1:17-cv-00865-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY

HEARING

v.

ORDER ON MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS

PEREZ, et al., (Docs. 58, 62) Defendants.

16 On February 6, 2020, Defendants Crisanto and Mello filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 57.) On February 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed a document titled, “Exhaustion Motion.” (Doc. 58.) Upon review of the document, the Court found that it was intended to serve as an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and construed it as such. (Doc. 59.) On February 27, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a supplement to his opposition. (Id.) On February 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed a document titled, “Motion to Provide a Specification of the Particular Facts on which Discovery is to be had or the Issues on which Discovery is Necessary.” (Doc. 60.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.