Chaudhry

Chaudhry v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20201:16-cv-01243California4,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERVAIZ A. CHAUDHRY, M.D., et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-01243-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF IN

v. LIMINE ORDER

SONIA ANGELL, et al., (ECF No. 104, 107) Defendants.

16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ supplemental briefing which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the order addressing the parties’ motions in limine. The Court heard oral argument on April 22, 2020. Counsel Ty Kharazi and Thornton Davidson appeared by video for Plaintiffs, and counsel Diana Esquivel appeared by video for Defendants. Having considered the pleadings and the arguments presented at the April 22, 2020 hearing, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Pervaiz A. Chaudhry, M.D., and Valley Cardiac Surgery Medical Group (“Plaintiffs’) filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Fresno County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.