Hill

(HC) Harrell v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20202:20-cv-00060California562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA NEIL HARRELL, No. 2:20-cv-00060 JAM GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER RICK HILL, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion for reconsideration of the undersigned’s March 20, 2022 order and a motion for default judgment. ECF Nos. 15, 16. On January 22, 2020, the court directed respondent to file a response to petitioner’s habeas petition. ECF No. 5. On March 17, 2020, respondent filed a motion for a 60-day extension of time in which to file and serve a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 11. On March 18, 2020, respondent filed a corrected certificate of service for the motion for extension of time. ECF No. 13. On March 20, 2020, the undersigned granted respondent’s request for an extension of time to and including May 22, 2020. ECF No. 14. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.