Chacko
Chacko v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RUBY CHACKO, No. 2:19-cv-01837-JAM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
NO. 3,
16 Defendant. 17 Before this Court is Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration, (“Mot.”) ECF No. 32, of the Magistrate Judge’s ruling granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel, March 16, 2020 Order (“Order”), ECF No. 29. Plaintiff requests that the Court overrule the Magistrate Judge’s findings and grant the motion to compel as it pertains to conflict-of- interest discovery. Mot. at 9. For the reasons stated below this Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration. /// /// I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ruby Chacko (“Plaintiff”) was a participant in Defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 (“Defendant” or “the Plan”). Mot. at 2. The Plan is…