Catherine

Catherine v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20202:19-cv-01487California3,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD CATHERINE, No. 2:19-cv-1487 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Donald Catherine is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 3, 2020, the undersigned issued an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss and granting plaintiff further leave to amend. (ECF No. 14.) Instead of filing an amended complaint plaintiff has filed an objection to the March 3, 2020 order. (ECF No. 15.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned now recommends that plaintiff’s amended complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on December 10, 2018, by filing a complaint in the Sacramento County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-2 at 3.1) Plaintiff is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.