Pfeiffer

(PC) Martinez v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20201:19-cv-01768California738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO MARTINEZ, No. 1:19-cv-01768-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR RECONSIDERATION

C. PFEIFFER, et al., (Doc. No. 25) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Ricardo Martinez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is plaintiff’s April 20, 2020 request for reconsideration1 of the undersigned’s April 9, 2020 order adopting in full the assigned magistrate judge’s January 9, 2020 findings and recommendations. (Doc. Nos. 13, 22, 25.) In its April 9, 2020 order, the court adopted the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismissed this action as duplicative. (Doc. No. 22.) ///// 26 The court notes that plaintiff’s filing was styled as “[o]bjections” to the magistrate judge’s findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.