Alavardo-Ceballos
Alavardo-Ceballos v. Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
1.40 UV VUUS LE EAL Lr NY bVVULIICIIl tw PHU Veni corey Payee +ViIs+
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SOLEDAD ALVARDO-CEBALLOS, Case No. 1:20-CV-00091-DAD-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CAPITAL v. ONE BANK (USA) WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NATIONAL (ECF No. 14) ASSOCIATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 On April 27, 2020, Plaintiff Soldedad Alavardo-Ceballos filed a notice of voluntary 17 dismissal of Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (“Capital One”). (ECF 18 No. 14). Defendant Capital One has not filed either an answer or a motion for summary 19 judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case solely with respect to Capital One has 20 ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of 21 San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to 22 designate on the docket that Defendant Capital One Bank…